Talk:Lower White River Wilderness

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Format Editing Request

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Done —EncMstr (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Format editing is requested to help improve this article. MetaCow (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC

Thanks :) MetaCow (talk) 05:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links request

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article could use a bit more with the external links, in my opinion. If anybody thinks otherwise, please tell me now and explain your reasoning or else I`ll go ahead and add some more external links. Oh, and this has nothing to do with the external links request, but if that sounded a little mean, please know I had not meant it to sound that way. Thank you. MetaCow (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Per the external links guideline, it's not about the number of links, but how they relate to the article. Go ahead and add them: if anyone disagrees, they will be removed. —EncMstr (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, you`re right. I`ll just leave it the way it is then. MetaCow (talk) 14:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic