Talk:Love Honor Cherish

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Love Honor Cherish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091119062606/http://www.signforequality.com:80/ to http://www.signforequality.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Love Honor Cherish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

My Personal Evaluation of the Article edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article is structured well and no information seems out of place or distracting from the topic. The article stays neutral throughout and in doing so, shows no bias for one side over the other. Great Job on that! However, I think that it may be useful to implement more information and minor changes to certain Sections of the article. Here are some of my suggestions:

Significant Activities Before November 4, 2008

Could add more information on how the, newly created, organization focused its outreach on "the truth about marriage and developing a new generation of leadership on this issue" by possibly finding an example of their early outreach tactics. Could also implement a source that shows their focus in action, doing so will show credibility behind the statement of what their focus was/is.

I believe that there should be a source attached to "Heroes & History Makers Gala" and its amount raised for LHC if available.

Approach to Gathering Signatures

If available, more information on "Sign for Equality" should be noted. Creation date, total signatures gathered through the site, etc. This will paint a better picture of this tactic and provide information that will give the reader a better understanding of what was happening then.

Was there any other methods that LHC used to gather signatures or was it just through the webpage? If it was only through the webpage, I think that should be noted. If other methods were used, they should also be noted in order to make this segment of information more complete.

External links

Love Honor Webpage link seems to be dead. Does not lead anywhere.

References

Reference 1 is a Dead Link

Reference 3 does not lead to the information that it is citing.

Reference 4 has moved webpages... Broken Link

Reference 5 is outdated and needs to be updated: also leads to the LA Times homepage rather than an article that cites the information provided.

Thanks for reading, Crmitche95 (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic