Untitled edit

This doesn't really read like a typical encyclopedic, NPOV Wikipedia article. ~ magbatz 16:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

...which means it reads like a typical Wikipedia article.
In all seriousness, some more historical and symbological information would help. Chubbles (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Is the bent O sculpture in LOVE similar to the logo used for Harpo productions? --Merle Lang (talk) 01:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Was that meant to happen edit

Hello, i tried to add the 'ahava' (featured in Indiana's own article) picture but it didn't show when i pressed save. It wasn't vandalism was it? It didn't say anything about that in the View History page. 77.99.231.37 (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Updated location of Indianapolis LOVE edit

From the Wikipedia Saves Public Art project, feel free to use: LOVE On Flickr The piece was moved after the Indianapolis Museum of Art was renovated.

The LOVE Font edit

The letters were hand drawn, adapted from a print sample. According to a 2013 interview with Ted Loos of Vogue, "He originally created the blue-green-red image as a Christmas card for the Museum of Modern Art, and he lifted the blocky font from an old address book." The exact base font is unknown, but similar to the Didone/Clarendon families. Ahazred8 (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Love (sculpture). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

First rendition question and article discrepancies edit

The page List of Love sculptures mentions that the first statue was erected at a university in 1970, while other pages (i.e. LOVE (Indianapolis)) say that the first one is at the Indianapolis art museum (the List page lists that one as the second sculpture). A discrepancy which should be clarified and made uniform among the related pages. Anyone have any background or sources on this? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Love (sculpture). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply