Talk:Louisville Metro EMS

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Untitled

edit

If you're going to edit this page, proofread your work. The syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling within recent edits is awful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.30.140 (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Emsnewlogojpg.jpg

edit
 

Image:Emsnewlogojpg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Metrosafe1.jpg

edit
 

Image:Metrosafe1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

need help

I am really trying to clean up the problem I'm having with citing references. I am gathering as many as possible but am continually running into technical problems inserting them properly using the Wiki code. Any help would be appreciated. THANKS!

Major content that was removed has been restored

edit

Recently over 20K bytes of content as well as the tags at the top were removed without any explanation. When content of that amount is removed, there needs to be an explanation as to why the content has been removed. Also, if tags are removed, there needs to be an explanation about how the tags no longer apply. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 11:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Louisville Metro EMS/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I would still call this a 'Start' as all the external links need to be turned into references. Further, I'm not sure if the article is as referenced as it should be. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 15:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC) I raised this article to B class after reorganizing information, removing large amounts of uneeded and unsourced information, reorganization of images, and adding references. The article needs some more references to advance onto a Good Article status. A few more images perhaps. -Jahnx (talk) 08:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 08:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 22:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louisville Metro EMS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Louisville Metro EMS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply