| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.louiseenglishfancentre.com/biography.htm. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2007102910013187. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Edit war
editI've reverted Louiseenglishfancentre last round of reverts for the following reasons;
- The Louiseenglishfancentre's edits are not neutral and appear to be very much like a fanpage. Content like "wowing the audience" is not encyclopedic or neutral.
- Many of Louiseenglishfancentre's cites are to what appear to be their own personal fansite, which may (or may not) be endorsed by the article's subject. This presents a conflict of interest and an issue of primary sources.
- Louiseenglishfancentre is reverting without supplying any reason for removing edits by another user. This looks like a case of Ownership.
Could Louiseenglishfancentre explain their thinking, and also bear in mind that they are very close to breaching Wikipedia policy on edit warring. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I've also further neutralised things, and list the below as examples of uncited opinions that are not neutrally expressed;
- one of the true masters of burlesque comedy
- quickly became favourites of fans
- She stole the show
- she earned acclaim
- amazed audiences
Some of these would be almost acceptable if they were sourced from reliable sources. But currently they appear to be the opinion of one fan. It needs to be kept in mind that Wikipedia is not a fansite. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Removed non-working YouTube links
editThe following links now only lead to the message: "This video has been removed by the user."
Archived here for reference.
D.o.b., please
editCan we have date-of-birth, please, as standard on Wiki pages. Valetude (talk) 07:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)