Talk:Louis Crews

Latest comment: 6 months ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Louis Crews/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 23:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Notes edit

  • Added college basketball coaches in the US due to there being no Jarvis coaches cat and added Yale alumni cat.
  • In the lead should there be a comma after Lewis?   Done
    • Actually, I don't think noting that there was sometimes misspelling is that important for the lead - I removed that part.
  • Shouldn't we include the womens basketball championships in the infobox?
    • Added.
      • Infobox says when they won the two titles but body doesn't. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
        • Added.
  • And the Alcorn and Albama baseball also since the football SIAC is included.   Done
    • Added.
  • unlink Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Conference in later life. Its already linked in the body.   Done
    • Delinked.
  • What's the Lewis Crews Classic?   Done
  • Where are the Javier records from in the record table?   Done
    • Jarvis Christian? Here - should I add it in as a ref?
      • There's already a ref at the end of the table so yes add ref 2 also.
        • Added.
  • Do you think we should say something about all three of those schools being historically black? Idk   Done
    • Eh, I don't think its needed, but I can add it if you want.

That's all I think. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • @WikiOriginal-9: BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "the women's basketball team to two championships (1951 and 1952) and the baseball team to a South Central Athletic Conference (SCAC) crown in 1953." Having SCAC on just the baseball part makes it sound like the basketball titles weren't SCAC. Were they? WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 12:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • @WikiOriginal-9: I would assume the basketball titles were SCAC, as the men's team at least were in the SCAC and I don't think I've seen an instance were the men were one conference and women the other, so I changed the wording to and led the women's basketball team to two South Central Athletic Conference (SCAC) championships (1951 and 1952) and the baseball team to a SCAC title in 1953 — does that work? BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

All issues have been addressed. Passing the article. Nice work! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply