Talk:Loti (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this today --K. Peake 07:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Pipe urban to Urban contemporary music in the infobox
• Remove EMM from brackets since abbreviations of labels are not useful here, plus shouldn't Loudcom Media be the first label listed?
• Add "as a single" after the release date
• ""Loti" was composed and" → "The song was composed and" plus this should be swapped with the release sentence for correct order
• "by Gjata, and produced as well as arranged by" → "by Gjata, while produced and arranged by" and remove the German producers introduction
• Pipe urban to Urban contemporary music*"with its lyrics telling a tale of a woman, who losses" → "with the lyrics telling a tale of a woman, who loses" to avoid overusage of it
• There's not enough reviews for a clear consensus, so write something like some critics or a few music critics to avoid bias
• ""Loti" experienced success" → "The song experienced success"
• "and further reached" → "while further reaching"

Background and composition

• Remove "had previously" since this is the beginning of the section and also the only teaser mentioned
• The announced and ultimate release date was 10 June 2021, so alter appropriately
• Pipe urban to Urban contemporary music
• "who losses the intimacy" → "who loses the intimacy"
• "yourself, would you?"." → "yourself, would you?"" per MOS:QUOTE on quotes ending with specified punctuation like this

Reception

• Remove the overview part because there's not enough reviews to back it up
• Bong Mines Entertainment should not be italicised
• "give a "traditional and "ethnic"" → "give a "traditional, ethnic""
• The chart-topping position is not mentioned by [12] unless my translator is faulty
• [13] shows a song previously charted in 2019, making this not her first hit in Switzerland
• "at number 47 and 61," → "at numbers 47 and 61,"

Music video

• Img looks good!
• Remove for "Loti" after accompanying music video
• "alongside Albanian producer Borin Leka." → "alongside producer Borin Leka." because Albanian is the most recently used nationality
• Remove generally praised by reviewer at the start of the sentence
• The word "fancy" is not used in the source at all

It's mentioned in the mid-lead of the article; in Albanian "lezetshëm" means chic, sweet or cute. Iaof2017 (talk) 12:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

• Good

Track listing

• Good

Charts

Weekly charts

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Year-end charts

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Release history

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION
• Label → Label(s)

References

• Copyvio score looks solid at 18.0%!!!
• Apple Music should only be wikilinked once for ref 3
• Cite Eurovistan as work/website instead on ref 7
• Cite Eurovision Union as work/website instead on ref 8
• WP:OVERLINK of Top Channel on refs 10 and 20
• WP:OVERLINK of Swiss Hitparade on ref 15
• Cite YouTube in the via parameter instead on ref 16
• Cite Albanian Post as work/website instead on ref 21

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 10:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Kyle Peake:. Thank you for your review I solved your comments, but left a reply on a comment above. :) Iaof2017 (talk) 13:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Iaof2017 ✓ Pass now; I understand your point about fancy and did some quick copy editing myself! --K. Peake 10:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank youu. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 13:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)