Is there an inline source that could be added to reference all those books since they have no ISBN nor other verifiable evidence that they exist. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Sigh, from the German Wikipedia, the normal problem. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Should we reduce to those listed on Amazon, as English readers profit less from all-German? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- worldcat, found one even in English, will add! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- DNB German National Library
- Worldcat and DNB are already in the article (authority control), what else do you think is needed? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- I'm just looking for a source or sources that can be added inline into that section, even if it's "Sources:[1][2][3] etc"... The Rambling Man (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- But why would you want to cite inline what's cited in authority control = authoritive library listings? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Because readers don't necessarily know how to verify the details within the article. Why should they know what "authority control" (which is essentially external links in any case) means and does? I haven't tagged it, I think you know what I'm looking for, but if you don't think it necessary, your call. I just find it difficult to justify dozens of bullet points of unlinked items without any inline referencing. It's certainly something I'd never do in an article of any quality standard. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- I translated it, I didn't write it. What do we have the AC section for? - I'll give the DNB library as an inline source, but I feel it's a duplication. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
