Talk:Los Angeles bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
SPORTS edit
Is that O.K that i put the sports section of L.A.?--Redspork02 18:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
No reason for cleanup edit
I don't see why the cleanup tag is needed, and I have removed it.--Desmond Hobson 23:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Unreferenced edit
I've added the unreferenced tag. The biggest problem is that much of it currently looks like Original research and speculation. There is also a Chicago Tribune quote, but you need to do a full reference (preferably using the {{cite news}} template). BlankVerse 12:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Some one needs to change that picture of the lAC their is a new on their website
Supporters edit
- THat visit took place last week and all of the above people are mentioned in the article. Please dont remove.--Redspork02 14:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
WHAT A BUMMER!!!--Redspork02 20:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Screw it. Still, I know Chicago won't get the games either. Oh well... there's always 2020.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513130235/http://www.sccog.org/webapp/servlet/content/view/42/1/ to http://www.sccog.org/webapp/servlet/content/view/42/1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)