Talk:Lorne Saxberg

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Protection

edit

To the anon editor(s?): would you please address why you think the following additions are remotely relevant to the article?

  • Saxberg returned regularly to Toronto with his Canadian-born partner, whom he met in Tokyo.
In the absence of his partner's name, what's the value in including this sentence?
  • He certainly left me with some interesting impressions. For years he was both a fixture on the CBC and Toronto's gay village. [web link]
Honestly, what on earth do you see as the value in including a link to a non-notable blog entry detailing a not-particularly-notable (and actually unverifiable, for that matter) sexual encounter that Saxberg might have had five years ago?

Could you please explain what the point of these edits was? I don't get the relevance of links that provide nebulous and/or inappropriate detail about his personal life. If you're just trying to do a "sick gay fisting pervert" smear on him, you can quit it right now; the article isn't hiding the fact that he was gay, so I don't see why graphic gossip about his sex life is required. You Frankers are more than usually obsessed with this guy, and I genuinely fail to understand why that is.

Oh, and while we're at it, I don't even want to know what anybody thinks the point of categorizing him as "2006 AIDS" was, do I? Bearcat 03:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lorne Saxberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply