Talk:Loricariidae

Mass Merge of Various Pleco Articles into Loricariidae

Several users (including me) are thinking about merging several (< 11 total) tiny articles regarding pleco species into this article. At the most, this would include a little list of notable species because the individual articles more or less all say the same thing.

Any insight before the merge is done would be appreciated, however please comment on Talk:Plecostomus#Loricariid instead of here due so all the comments from other articles are kept in a central location. Keithieopia (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Identification on this page...

The pictures of the fish identifies as Hypostomus plecostomus, and whilst it is POSSIBLE that the one sucking on the glass is correctly identified, I'm pretty certain neither is a Hypostomus. I think it is Pterygoplichthys pardalis - in the the case of the fish on the substrate, it has more than 8 dorsal rays, and combined with its pattern it can only be a Pterygoplicthys. The one sucking onthe glass is harder to say for sure, but here's my thouthgs: the fish is long/thin, where Hypostomus are a bit "stubbier", and the pattern on the belly of Hypostomus is more small spotted on a slightly darker base, rather than dark gray on a nearly white base.

Matsp100 (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loricariidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060422083038/http://www.aquariacentral.com/articles/lnumbers.shtml to http://www.aquariacentral.com/articles/lnumbers.shtml
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ufrgs.br/ni/vol3num4%5CNI_v3n4p543-548lowr.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loricariidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930013139/http://www.ufrgs.br/ni/vol3num2/Artigo04p271-276lr.pdf to http://www.ufrgs.br/ni/vol3num2/Artigo04p271-276lr.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Very Pretentious And Confused Writing Style

Under "Description and biology", it says, for example:

"The modified mouth and lips allow the fish to feed, breathe, and attach to the substrate through suction."

Modified from what? Modified indicates the action of a third party. A much more correct term would be "unique" - or "unusual" - or better still, nothing at all. It's a mouth, and that's what evolution gave it. No better or worse or ... just different from other catfish - but even that isn't always true. This needs to be fixed.

Also, what does "attach to the substrate ..." mean? Why can't the author use plain English instead of throwing in the arcane term "substrate" Substrate of what? There is no prior definition of a surface or material being attached to. This word can apply to just about anything that has layers, including silicon chips (wafers). Why not just say: "attach to the feeding surface" or something a non-fish expert can understand.

I call this pretentious because the article goes out of its way to use jargon and "3-dollar" words when a simple word or term will suffice and make for much easier reading by regular people who are not fishy biologists. Save the jargon for scientific papers and journals. This isn't the place to show the world how "smart" you are. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC)