- This might merit more explanation, though I'm not sure this is the place for it. I attributed the effect to differing frame rates in the original prints. Most of the later films appear to be frame-for-frame (doubled up) (aa-bb-cc-dd) while some of the early ones are interlaced (a-ab-b-bc-c). So the relative ratios of film frames to DVD frames is 1:2 in the first case and 2:3 in the second. I'm not aware of the DVD encoding process and whether that would have an effect not already required for the display standard. --Dystopos 14:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Apparently, they own progressive copies for all these films, but for the NTSC version they probably digitally re-encoded the video. This would explain the PAL version being 25 fps progressive, as re-encoding NTSC telecines in PAL results as very, VERY bad interlaced video of low quality. --213.91.184.25 16:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
One article for an ongoing annual series of box set collections is simply not enough. The articles for the individual volumes must be kept intact. Steelbeard1 (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
- The article has been saved. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
