This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Without commenting on the merit--or lack thereof--of the article, the topic is quite clearly not just a dictionary entry. Anyway, what's the reason to merge it with Hanfu? I don't see any indication that puts a connection between those two topics for a merge. I would just suggest a deletion, considering the creating author established little by the single iffy webcitation and the lack of coverage in other sources (albeit, the Chinese characters are unknown to me). --Cold Season (talk) 22:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
talk 06:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)