Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Another @MagicatthemovieS: review, which seem to be getting easier each time. There was a single typo; a dash fix; I changed Composition to Composition and style per the MOS; I removed a small quote that didn't really add anything to the casual readers' understanding of the topic; and I re-arranged a couple of sentences in the Music video sub-section: [1]; [2]. Other than those: perfecto.

• All images are creative commons, with exception of the audio file which is less than the 10% limit and has a valid fair-use rationale for this article.
• Prose is well-written and engaging, spare the single typo I rectified above, and all accurately transcribed from reliable sources.
• Earwig's tool showed no copyvio, spare the usual direct quotations.
• No disambiguation or external link issues found.

Happy to promote this. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: