Talk:Lone Star Funds/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
Criminal History Nothing smelled right about a cowboy firm that raids on LBOs and keeps its money in Bermuda. A quick google search brings up quite a few hits, including stuff life this: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2006/11/lone_star_feeli.html I would recommend adding a controversy section and watching this page for deletions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riselikehelium (talk • contribs) 16:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
There is mention of an Irish "shell" company; can see no reference that even suggests this - evidence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.202.189.83 (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Order of Wiki
I think the problem is this entry is in a weird format for this category. Should be the Intro, History, Approach, Investments (stole it from Goldman). I will take a crack at it. Should be plenty of sources with these high profile endeavors. Also, I'm not a fan of the bullet format and question the motivation/neutrality of the controversy. I will look into it. --Monstermike99 (talk) 02:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Controversy
This is a very one-sided and narrow aspect of a larger investment that if you read is kind of a stretch. Plus the author is anonymous and only contributed this one section ever on Wiki. This is where the bulleted flag is more suited that this major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject, being those tenants. It doesn't belong unless its directly related to the subject, not just lawsuits against the parties who have the most money. --Monstermike99 (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC)