Talk:London Museum of Water & Steam

Ruislip Lido Railway

Ruislip Lido Railway has a steam train too and is in London — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.50.53 (talk • contribs) 13:35, May 22, 2007

Rename article?

There are recent changes to rename this article internally from "Kew Bridge Steam Museum" to "London Museum of Water and Steam".

http://kbsm.org has nothing on these changes. The most prominent source for them seems to be Facebook. There seems to be some relaunching happening on March 22nd, but there's no sourcing for a rename.

Should this rename stay? Should the article be renamed in its entirety? Should the intro read "The London Museum of Water and Steam, formerly the Kew Bridge Steam Museum, ..." ?

As someone not entirely inexperienced in museum marketing it sounds like some abominable brain-fart by someone in a Thames Water marketing office, to piss away thirty years of world-recognised goodwill and branding as Kew Bridge in favour of "London", one of the world's most over-used, abused and diluted brands for any tourist. But then I'm just an oily rag at the bottom of the engine shed, what do I know... Andy Dingley (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Amendments

Amended Railway as it is not the only steam / narrow gauge railway in London

Tidied up the introduction including a link to an article that discusses the rebrand. The new website will be launched shortly and the article will need to be renamed.

Also rewrote a number of areas, added more information and references about the museum and site.

Will be creating stubs to provide more information on each individual engine in due course.

--Edstannard (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Living Steam Museum?

I made a visit there in 1993, and I have in mind that the museum was named "Living Steam Museum" at that time. Is this correct or an error? --Joerg 130 (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on London Museum of Water & Steam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222043021/http://kbsm.org/project-aquarius/ to http://www.kbsm.org/project-aquarius/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222043021/http://kbsm.org/project-aquarius/ to http://kbsm.org/project-aquarius/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416191839/http://www.kbsm.org/get-involved to http://www.kbsm.org/get-involved/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)