Talk:London Docklands/Archive 1

Archive 1

Oldest comments

This (really rather good) article could use some historical pictures. Also a mention of the impact the National Dock Labour Scheme would be useful. Icundell 21:57, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)Bold text:Actually, when I get a mo I'll go through the Docklands Today section - it's so full of puff f[ ofsit could have been written by a local fvrrwfve fact the article itself refers to "London Docklands" in several places, this seems appropriate?Stevage 00:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Agree to rename to be a more specific one, like the purposed London Docklands -- 172.178.182.82 12:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought it was poorly named, too: definitely a good move. Then docklands can be general with links to all the specific articles. JackyR | Talk 14:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Link to Amsterdam

Would someone who can make the syntax work like to insert a fourth link in this list of interesting docklandses?

"Amsterdam Eastern Docks" to point to nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oostelijk Havengebied

Much obliged TobyJ 12:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Poor choice of language

"...Nick Schroeder, formed the Iron Triangle (LDDC) because he felt like it." - surely this isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.221.87 (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Pictures

Is there a reason for the preponderance of night time photographs in this article? It could also do with more historical photos and some more illustrative ones (the Millennium Dome from Greenwich photo for example shows very little other than the river). Thryduulf (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Docklands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918022720/http://www.docklands24.co.uk/content/docklands/default/default.aspx to http://www.docklands24.co.uk/content/docklands/default/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Royal Docks Enterprise Zone

Should there be a mention of this body with a link to eg [1] as some overlap? Jackiespeel (talk) 14:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)