Talk:London Aquatics Centre

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Water sports Low‑importance

	London Aquatics Centre is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Article name change edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should the title of this article be amended to 'London Aquatics Centre' to ensure consistency with the Aquatics Centre in Manchester? This is called 'Manchester Aquatics Centre'. The Olympic Delivery Authority use the term 'London Aquatics Centre', for example in the January 2008 report "London Aquatics Centre: Submission of Reserved Matters".
Dean Armond 19:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

On the assumption that there is no dissent against this, I am going to be bold and move it myself. Helps correcting redirects would be appreciated. DJR (T) 15:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External Links edit

I created an External Links section but am not sure if the layout is correct. Any suggestions/amendments much appreciated.
Dean Armond 20:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

London Development Agency (LDA) edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The LDA was responsible for organising the competition to select the architect for the Aquatics Centre. The Panel of eight responsible for the evaluation was headed by Lord Rogers, architect, and Lord Carter of Coles in his role as Chair of Sport England.
Nearly two hundred expressions of interest were followed by forty submissions which were reduced to a shortlist of six. The selection of Zaha Hadid was announced on 31st January, 2005, and detailed designs for the building were released in November 2006.
Would it be useful to add a section with this information to the main article? Subsequent events such as the need for the centre to be re-designed, the cost increases considerably in excess of the original budget and the delayed opening date all relate to this topic.
Dean Armond 08:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes definitely! A good start to getting a proper 'development' section. Please make sure you add a source for any new info though - much easier to do this when info is added, rather than trying to go back later and find the source..Paulbrock (talk) 11:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Change priority edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should the importance of the article be raised from 'Low' as the London Aquatics Centre (LAQ) is becoming a topic of considerable interest in both the UK media and UK politics on both a local and national level? Topics raised about the LAQ include the deferred delivery date which has moved from 2008 to 2010, the substantial revisions to the design, and the increasing costs of the project which has significantly exceeded the original budget.

The election of Boris Johnson (Conservative Party) as Mayor of London, replacing Ken Livingstone (Labour Party), has seen renewed political interest in the LAQ. Boris Johnson has expressed concern over the management of the project and promised to carefully scrutinise all aspects, especially financial overspend. Dean Armond 14:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The 'importance' of an article is relative to the particular WP:Wikiproject assessing it, so for example, this article is considered high importance under WP:Architecture (not sure why, I don't really know that project), but low under WP:OLYMPICS - this is because High for WP:Olympics would be the main London 2012 article, Medium would be the main Olympic Stadium (London) article and low for all other venues. See also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics/Assessment.

If there was a London 2012 Wikiproject, then this may well get a Mid or High (maybe there will be in time, or at least a taskforce)

In practice, importance doesn't really matter - it's only a guideline to help determine which articles to focus effort on, and is fairly subjective.

Information on Boris's concerns would be great to add to the article! Paulbrock (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Depth and other technical information edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I included information about the main pool depth (3m), but I couldn't find the depth of the diving pool (the minimum according to Olympic rules is 4.5m, although 5m seems more usual and I found pages claiming that in Beijing it was 13m (but I suspect that is an error)). --Rps (talk) 00:16, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on London Aquatics Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic