Talk:Lombard Committee for Resolution 44
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lombard Committee for Resolution 44. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130415233550/http://onthenord.com/2013/04/08/passaggio-a-nord-est-57-color44-obiettivo-referendum/ to http://onthenord.com/2013/04/08/passaggio-a-nord-est-57-color44-obiettivo-referendum/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because, while short-lived, this committee was relevant during the campaign that lead to the 2017 Venetian autonomy referendum. En.Wikipedia is very inclusionist with minor parties and groups and that is a good thing. --Checco (talk) 14:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- I like to discuss in articles' talk pages, not in user talks. That is why I am reporting here the following message.
- The third reference in this article would appear to quote from Corriere della Sera but the URL provided in that reference would appear to be taken from "Corriere del Veneto", which doesn't have an English language Wikipedia article at present. I also note that Italian language Wikipedia article has a caveat "La rilevanza enciclopedica di questa voce o sezione sull'argomento editoria è stata messa in dubbio." about Corriere del Veneto.
- I would appreciate you thoughts about this.
- Pietro aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- The third reference in this article would appear to quote from Corriere della Sera but the URL provided in that reference would appear to be taken from "Corriere del Veneto", which doesn't have an English language Wikipedia article at present. I also note that Italian language Wikipedia article has a caveat "La rilevanza enciclopedica di questa voce o sezione sull'argomento editoria è stata messa in dubbio." about Corriere del Veneto.
- Hello User:Shirt58, Corriere del Veneto is the Venetian insert of Corriere della Sera, Italy's most popular and respected newspaper. Thus, I think that it is a good source, despite what it.Wikipedians might think of the it.Wikipedia's article. Thanks for writing! --Checco (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)