Talk:Lokmanya Tilak Terminus

Unreasonable deletions

It would seem that user Abhishek191288 is removing my images without a valid reason. Am undoing his edit & inviting others to give a few comments on the page. Superfast1111 (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree with the removals. The only images that should stay in this article are those depicting the station itself. (And even then, only a small number of representative images should be included; readers can always find more if the article links to the corresponding Commons category.) Extreme close-ups of individual trains which don't show the station are irrelevant. —Psychonaut (talk) 10:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 27 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved by technical request. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

---

Lokmanya Tilak Terminus railway station → Lokmanya Tilak Terminus – Removal of "railway station" suffix from the station name on all the Terminal stations as "Terminus" is already present in the name also as per WP:COMMONNAME. Sai199610 (talk) 09:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Propably best to discuss this. Sam Sailor 11:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

• Yes, may be, Fowler&fowler had pointed out "Terminus railway station" may be not common English usage at Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station#Requested move 15 June 2019. Matthew hk (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Since it need time to check google trend and ngram to confirm "Lokmanya Tilak Terminus" is The common name (not one of the common names), i leave to someone else to list the evidence. However, the article was originally located at "Lokmanya Tilak Terminus", until 2016 bold move by Balablitz, with edit summary "per proper naming convention". For that part, i am pretty much against to add "railway station" suffix to every railway station article, as "Terminus " already means "terminal station", a kind of "station". WP:Common name and WP:USEENGLISH should be greater factor than WP:CONSISTENCY. Matthew hk (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.