Talk:Logical reasoning/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Inductive-creative reasoning
I couln't find any useable information on this concept anywhere else than on this page. In fact, it looks more like some esoteric gobblewonk and not a concept of formal logic. Maybe just delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.150.9 (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Clarity. An Issue?
This wikipedia page is unusually straightforward. I wasn't expecting such slashing dialectic. Shouldn't this topic be more abstruse?
68.68.34.105 (talk) 17:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Done
Bold text
Logical Reasoning
Done Ryan McDaniel 22:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Abduction
Seems like the final rule of abduction should be "determine the precondition".
Done
Layman's Terms
Could you simplify the explanations? Maybe an example or two of each. --anonymous 12:42, 04 April 2007 (Eastern Time)
Typo in image
General Prinzipal?
Nonnb (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Done