Talk:Lockkeeper's House (Washington, D.C.)

Latest comment: 8 months ago by ModernDayTrilobite in topic Requested move 20 August 2023

Proposed move edit

A proposal to move this building was noted in January 2017 by the National Park Service. The notice lacks details; someone may wish to follow up. Magic♪piano 16:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockkeeper's House, C & O Canal Extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Layouts / floorplans? edit

Does anyone know if layouts or floorplans of the structure exist that could be included in the article? Or if they've changed over time as the building has been repurposed?

Peace and Passion   ("I'm listening....") 09:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removal of incorrect claim that the Lockkeeper's House is the oldest building on the National Mall edit

From the page on the National Mall (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Mall):

On December 8, 2016, the NPS listed on the National Register of Historic Places an increase in the National Mall Historic District's boundary to encompass an area bounded by 3rd Street, NW/SW, Independence Avenue, SW, Raoul Wallenberg Place, SW, the CSX Railroad, the Potomac River, Constitution Ave., NW, 17th Street, NW, the White House Grounds and 15th Street, NW. The listing's registration form, which contained 232 pages, described and illustrated the history and features of the historic district's proposed expanded area.

I thought I could correct the claim on this page easily by changing the words from "the National Mall" to "the National Mall proper". However, "the National Mall proper" not only does not include the White House, but also does not include the Lockkeeper's House (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Mall): — Preceding unsigned comment added by BIS DC (talkcontribs) 21:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 20 August 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Lockkeeper's House (Washington, D.C.). (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 21:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Lockkeeper's House, C & O Canal ExtensionLockkeeper's House – The proposed title currently redirects here, so no need to disambiguate. Most sources appear to refer to it as just the Lockkeeper's House. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 20:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.