Talk:Loch Eriboll

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comment edit

The article states that Eilean Choraidh was used for aerial bombing practice since it is "about the same size and shape as a battleship". I've just measured the island on the Admiralty chart of Loch Eriboll, and it is approximately 1300m long (not including intertidal areas), which is far, far longer than any battleship ever constructed or likely to be constructed. I suppose they might have meant either Eilean Cluimhrig (approx. 280m long) or An Dubh-sgeir (220m), which are at least of the right lenght, but don't look much like battleships, at least not on the chart. Wardog (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loch Eriboll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply