Talk:Loch Arbour, New Jersey

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Race and ethnicity in the United States census#Race|other races]] Anchor Race and ethnicity in the United States census#Race links to a specific web page: Race (human categorization). The anchor (#Race) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

In 1957 condos in the US didn't even exist yet, per Condominium#United_States, so it seems fishy that Loch Arbour would have incorporated to protect itself against the threat of a form of housing ownership that wasn't even legally recognized in New Jersey at the time. Something doesn't add up. Is it that they were actually just proposed apartment buildings, and the story got changed somewhere along the line? Many former high end apartment buildings were converted to condos after they were made legal, of course. The NY Times doesn't cite a source of course. Passdoubt | Talk 20:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loch Arbour, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.locharbournj.us/locharbournews.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160814022353/http://www.lwvnj.org/images/CG/2016_CG.pdf to http://www.lwvnj.org/images/CG/2016_CG.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic