Talk:Living Oceans Society

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

File:LivingOceansEdit.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:LivingOceansEdit.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Partial review edit

I haven't checked every reference yet to confirm that all claims are supported, but I've spot checked:

  • This article does not establish the long-term widespread notability of the organization. Please read and understand WP:GNG. This can be addressed by reliable sources (WP:RS), such as (print or electronic) newspapers, magazines, journals, books or perhaps government reports which support claims made in this article. LOS works have been cited elsewhere, and in scholarly works, as seen with the Find Sources (Scholar) link above.
  • Many references are WP:PRIMARY, sourced to LOS, and press releases. Primary sources are also reliable about themselves. This is necessary, but not sufficient: independent RS are also needed. Wikipedia reports what independent reliable sources state about organizations like LOS, not just what LOS says about LOS. This means primary sources can remain, but claims should be supported by independent RS.
  • Suzuki's blog is arguably reliable due to his notability, but an independent news story, in addition, is desirable.
  • Some "references" are merely links to website home pages which do not, in prose, support the claims made - these are actually footnotes. These can remain, but claims must also be supported by RS. Are there RS which support the footnoted organizations' association with LOS?
  • The article reads like it was written by editors with an interest in LOS. This brings in WP:POV issues, and Conflict of Interest policies. Please read WP:COI: organizations and staff should not write articles about themselves. It was, and COI has been discussed. Contributions of more reliable sources are very welcome.

--Lexein (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edited above for clarity. --Lexein (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Updated.--Lexein (talk) 01:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Specific source searches edit

--Lexein (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Living Oceans Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply