Talk:Livin' la Vida Loca/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by آرمین هویدایی in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • The non-free use rationales are all in great shape.
  • Add WP:ALT text and WP:UPRIGHT to every image.
  • "and is ranked [...] and is ranked" - kinda repetitive
  • Remove MOS:CONTRACTIONS (isn't, wasn't, etc.).
  • In the lead, remove the second link to Billboard (magazine).
  • Add a serial comma after Best Male Pop Vocal Performance (both times).
  • "awards shows" → "award shows"
  • Add a comma after "first English album".
  • "rock–inspired" → "rock-inspired" (WP:DASH)
  • Add a comma after "instead".
  • Wiklink bona fide.
  • Add a hyphen between "second best".
  • "respective nomination" → "a respective nomination"
  • Add a serial comma after "Pop Airplay".
  • Add a comma after "however".
  • Add a MOS:GEOCOMMA after Los Angeles, California.
  • Add a MOS:DATECOMMA after March 25, 1999.
  • "similar the lyrics" → "similar to the lyrics"
  • Remove the comma after "they kiss".
  • "gave it a performance" → "performed" (less wordy)
  • Add serial commas after "55th", "2007, 2014", and Marc Anthony.
  • Add a comma after "another article".
  • Most sources are archived.  
  • Sort categories in alphabetical order.
  • That's it from me. Great work!  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thank you so much for your comments, I followed all of them and fixed the issues you mentioned. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·