Talk:Live'r Than You'll Ever Be/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 17:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

• No disambiguation links
• References all work correctly

Lead / Infobox

• Live'r Than You'll Ever Be is a bootleg recording of a Rolling Stones concert in Oakland, California from 9 November 1969. --> Live'r Than You'll Ever Be is a bootleg recording of The Rolling Stones' concert in Oakland, California on 9 November 1969.
• It was one of the first live rock music bootlegs, and was made notorious as a document of the The Rolling Stones American Tour 1969 whose popularity forced the Stones' label Decca Records to release the live album Get Yer Ya-Yas Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert --> It was one of the first live rock music bootlegs and was made notorious as a document of the their 1969 tour of America. The popularity of the bootleg forced the Stones' label Decca Records to release the live album Get Yer Ya-Yas Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert (1970).
• Attach years after album titles with brackets.

Recording and release

• Live'r Than You'll Ever Be was recorded by "Dub" from Trademark of Quality using a Sennheiser shotgun microphone and a Uher "Report 4000" reel-to-reel tape recorder[2] and was the first audience-recorded bootleg to be mastered and distributed;[3] some sources consider it the first live bootleg --> Live'r Than You'll Ever Be was recorded by "Dub" from Trademark of Quality using a Sennheiser shotgun microphone and a Uher "Report 4000" reel-to-reel tape recorder. It was the first audience-recorded bootleg to be mastered and distributed;[3] some sources consider it the first live bootleg.

Reception

• Everything looks good. Not sure if "The sleeve's generic design was later copied by The Who's 1970 album Live at Leeds." belongs in this section though.

Track listing

• I know this isn't required, but how about using the track listing template?

Personnel

• Should probably move the image up a bit, so it doesn't disturb the references.

• Done I changed the "reception" section to "reception and influence" to make a stronger case for how it affected others as critics and musicians. I did not use {{Track listing}} because I dislike it. Anything else? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

  Everything looks good to me. Passing the article. Great work! Statυs (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.