Talk:Littorina

Self-contradict

"DNA analysis shows there is a significant genetic differentiation - not enough to consider these to be different species"

There is no absolute "cut-off" level of "enough" genetic distinctness that could be considered a "species threshold". It was once believed, but that theory is bullshit for a lot of reasons (in a nutshell, evolution does not work to suit researchers' desires of "clean" thresholds).

But the main point: "significant genetic differentiation", on its own, would imply that species status must seriously considered. So what's going on here? Genetic paraphyly? That's not a valid argument against species status (it is actually common between sister species). The question would have to be approached by a population-wide thorough sample, and if this shows at least some degree of genetic lineage sorting and consistent morphological distinctness, species status is more likely than not. Essentially, "distinct species" means "under natural conditions, reproductive isolation is dominant over gene flow". Thus, two recently-deverged species may be very similar genetically, but what counts is that they'll become ever more distinct as time progresses. And before species are reciprocally monophyletic, they are usually morphologically very distinct already (because morphological traits usually become established an order of magnitude faster than the sequences one studies in popgen/molphyl).

The source is unfortunately not accessible to me. I presume it lays out the case in more detail. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Littorina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005114623/http://lib.bioinfo.pl/pmid%3A12801472 to http://lib.bioinfo.pl/pmid:12801472

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)