Talk:Little rock thrush

Birds Low‑importance

Little rock thrush is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Little Rock Thrush Habitat: IUCN Red List wrong? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The IUCN Red List supports the statement 'Its natural habitats are subtropical or tropical dry forests, dry savanna, and subtropical or tropical dry shrubland'. I believe this should be changed to 'Rocky areas with some trees, also around human habitation' which is supported by Sinclair & Ryan as well as Stevenson & Fanshaw. :Br11n (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do change it, if you have a source! The IUCN isn't wrong, it's the program that automatically generated the page. —innotata 21:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic