This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The borders of Little Portugal should be better defined. The article says it is bound on the south by the CPR railway tracks. I think this is referring to the tracks below Queen Street but it's not clear. I would consider Little Portugal to go down to Queen Street as well, so if this is referring to Queen as the border that should be clear.
I wonder if the statistics about the Portuguese population are still relevant. When my parents first lived here in the 80s that was definitely the case that they were the largest ethnic group, but with gentrification I'm not so sure. If this isn't still true it should be updated. Or the statistics should have citations.
update According to 2011 statistics it looks like the largest language group was still Portuguese, but it was only 25.9%. I think the stat in the article should be changed to reflect this. [1]
