Talk:Litchfield Municipality

What does Local Government Areas of Darwin mean in the context of the category? Of these places, such as the Shire of Lichfield, only Darwin is in Darwin. Surely the NT local government areas cat is enough. --Bduke (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd agree, although Palmerston is entirely within the Darwin SD. But it's too small a category for any practical purpose (they normally say 6 is the absolute minimum a category should aspire to). Orderinchaos 14:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

What is SD? --Bduke (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, talking in code. :) Statistical Division. It's broadly speaking how capital cities are delineated. Orderinchaos 23:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

How do we find out what the one for Darwin covers? If it covers Palmerston, it might well cover at least part of Litchfield (where I used to live) and Cox Peninsula. On the cat, shall we just depopulate it, as all the articles in it are in the Local Governments of the NT cat, and then speedy it on its way or shall we put it to CFD? Enjoy your ANZAC Day, mate. --Bduke (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I spent it in Melbourne first watching Essendon get beaten (somewhat unfortunately, as my mate and I were barracking for them) and then at a Porcupine Tree concert which was well worth my short visit. This is a map of the SD, related info actually says it includes all of Palmerston, East Arm and Litchfield which came as a surprise to me. My advice would be to leave them in LG of NT and delete the underpopulated cat - we've done the same in WA, even considering Perth has about 30 of our 144 LGAs. Orderinchaos 08:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Then Coomalie is not in this Darwin SD according to your map. I have removed it and will put the cat to CfD. Glad you enjoyed Melbourne again. --Bduke (talk) 11:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Litchfield Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091005013218/http://nt.gov.au/placenames/localities/litchfield/index.shtml to http://nt.gov.au/placenames/localities/litchfield/index.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)