Talk:List of whistleblowers

Latest comment: 16 days ago by 174.50.61.140 in topic Inclusion criteria

Rebekah Jones

edit

Why is Rebekah Jones included in this list? While her initial claims gave her (temporary) whistleblower protections while being investigated, the subsequent investigations found that her claims were unsubstantiated. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/27/us/florida-report-coronavirus-numbers-manipulated/index.html https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2022/05/28/report-rejects-rebekah-jones-claim-that-florida-doctored-covid-data/ https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2022/05/27/rebekkah-jones-report-fails-support-claims-florida-covid-19-data-doctored/9953780002/ https://www.wusf.org/health-news-florida/2022-05-28/ig-report-finds-rebekah-jones-claims-of-covid-19-manipulation-to-be-unsubstantiated-and-unfounded — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.12.7.121 (talk) 03:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

IRS Whistleblowers

edit

At what point should the current IRS Whistleblower’s Gary Shapley and Joseph Zeigler be added to the list? WhowinsIwins (talk) 03:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Something wrong with Lowercase sigmabot III

edit

Lowercase sigmabot III seems to be archiving topics on this page within a matter of *hours*. Hiding away new discussions is obviously detrimental to the entire purpose of a "Talk" page. DKEdwards (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Inclusion criteria

edit

This list is not adhering to its own inclusion criteria. any person may be listed, provided there is an article [here on Wikipedia] about the whistleblowing event. Optionally, their name can be piped to the event to provide consistent blue links. Subsequent consensus holds that an article on a scandal, without a specific article on a whistleblowing event related to that scandal, is generally insufficient. 174.50.61.140 (talk) 14:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply