Talk:List of uranium projects

Missing Data

where are Polish mines??

Added the names of 15 abandoned mines of Poland. More data has to be compiled and added.

• Tharikrish 14:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Uranium tonnage and grade

To be in conformity with international reporting standards, I think it will be better to change over to tU and %U instead of tU₃O₈ and %U₃O₈. I am affecting the changes immediately; however the conversion of the values will done over the next few days.  Tharikrish  07:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Prospective uranium mines

I am proposing a major clean-up of this section, as it is my contention that exploration properties do not qualify as "Prospective" mines. There should be some "significant" uranium mineralization on the property in one drill hole, preferably more, to even make this list. Turgan ^Talk 14:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Agree. There may be an argument for a much less detailed "Reserves" section, assuming a reliable source is found. –Moondyne 14:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Agree (belated). Will try to define the criteria based on UNFC-2009: Commercial projects (Operational mines + Planned), Potential Commercial Projects (prospective mines).  Tharikrish  20:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Merge with Uranium mining

I think that this page needs to be merged with the list at uranium mining which is in a list instead of a table giving the reader a more global overview -- eiland (talk) 10:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Uranium mining article is a general descriptive article. We need a list that tracks all operational, closed and planned uranium mines. This is factual data with real metrics for each mine - a living database. Uranium mining article is not a list. Both serves different purposes. This is a list, as well as a table (as most WP list are). So let us keep this (and improve it!)  Tharikrish  20:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Tharikrish, that this list is better kept as a separate article. Plazak (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Keep Separate and do not clutter the main article with this list Gioto (talk) 21:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Keep separate. As has been stated, the need for a separate listing of mines at various staged of development/closure is a great resource, and would clutter up the general article. Turgan ^Talk 00:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of uranium projects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040603085718/http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0010.shtml to http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0010.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)