Talk:List of star systems within 60–65 light-years
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction notes
edit- Things to do
Add apparent magnitudeIncrease accuracy of Spectral type (e.g. M4V instead of Mv)Add references (not immediately essential)
I have left the old codes from {{nsx}} commented out in the "Comments" section. I have left them in mainly for the rows with multiple stars, as they often specify the names of the secondary stars. Feel free to remove them when no longer relevant. Primefac (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of star systems within 60–65 light-years. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061216035035/http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/deltaequ.html to http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/deltaequ.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)