Talk:List of protected areas of Ontario
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editOct 10, 2006: The 'Out There page for Ontario' link seems to be dead ( http://www.out-there.com/ppk_mon.htm )
I'll try it for the next few days, then remove it from the main page.
Basho 23:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the dead link to Out There page for Ontario Basho 16:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:OntarioParks-logo.png
edit
The image Image:OntarioParks-logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Table?
editThis page looks like it could benefit from the introduction of some tables. Any objections? Radiowallah (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Radiowallah
Corrected size of Wasaga Beach park
editThe citation leads to the Park's web site but the data on size had been incorrect. I just corrected that to 6.8 hectares.
•This natural area of 6.8 hectares protects wildlife habitat and nesting shorebirds, including the Piping Plover, which is endangered.
Peter K Burian (talk) 21:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- CORRECTION: My mistake; the park is 1844.30 hectares of which 6.8 ha are protected. I reverted my edit to make the correction. Peter K Burian (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Holy Red Links!
editWhat do you guys think about stripping some out of there, not sure if y'all have discussed this before or not. Just seems a bit overkill. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think that any of the protected areas would be able to sustain a standalone article. Per Wikipedia:Red link, they should stay. --Whpq (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)