Talk:List of online digital musical document libraries
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Sources edit
It looks like sources were once a part of this article, but all were removed by one sweeping edit. Any particular reason why? It seems to have seriously decreased the value of this article as a resource. Plays88keys (talk) 04:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Removed Flag for Deletion edit
I see this as a well laid out structured list. Yes, it has links, but it's a valuable resource. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngreen2001 (talk • contribs)
- Please see WP:EL. An article is not supposed to have links in the body like that. A structured table would be fine, but they should link to the articles, with no ELs. On top of that, while I didn't check them all, I'm guessing every single so-called reference is just another link to the archive, which renders it doublely problematic. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- I did. It states that it is not normally recommended to include external lists in the body of an article. Not that they are banned. The nature of this particular list would seem to be an exception to me. I agree with the references, though. I would think a cleanup tag or similar would be more applicable. Ngreen2001 (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Affiliation note edit
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
I only made an update to the statistics (viewable from the IMSLP counter on the site's main page), which were very out-of-date. I believe this should be uncontroversial. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Needs updating edit
This reeeally needs a careful update. While copyediting this article I found a few of the resources either no longer existed or are now available as part of another resource already listed. I only checked a few resources in the first place, so actually most of the ones I checked were not really appropriate for listing here anymore (apparently). Add to this the fact that very few working links are provided to actually find the resources themselves, and you have a pretty sucky situation. - dcljr (talk) 03:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)