Talk:List of native Philippine chicken breeds

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Justlettersandnumbers in topic Copyright problem removed

Potential Copyright Issue question edit

this pdf file link [1] is utilizing some parts including some of the pictured breeds of the article obviously copypasted from the Philippine Native Chicken article from Wikipedia website. It is an act of plagiarism on part of the owner of the PDF file posted in this site http://entrp2.site88.net The purpose is to reference the different breeds written in the Wikipedia article, therefore the Philippine Native Chicken article in Wikipedia did not expressly violate copyright claim. Wikipedia article written in 2011.

i, the author of this article verified that the writer/author of the PDF file in question is therefore guilty of plagiarism. Fowl vet (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you that the author of that document, created on 27 March 2014, appears to have copied much of the content from our page here; I'll tag this page accordingly. However, it also seems that almost all of this article was itself copied without attribution in February 2011 from our page on the Rhode Island Red, as this Duplication detector report confirms. Copying within Wikipedia is perfectly acceptable, but attribution must be given – please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I'll deal with that too. But that also means that little of the content in this article has anything to do with this chicken breed, and that it thus needs to be radically rewritten from independent reliable sources. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Plagiarism edit

  • - due to the plagiarism that was committed by a researcher from the site http://entrp2.site88.net/, i as the orginal author of the Philippine Native Chicken article, decided to rewrite the article restoring the Philippine local definitions and variations of the Philippine native chicken. The old article describes the local descriptions and definitions of the breed but the admin of wikipedia dismissed that my article has been copied from another article which is wrong..i'm a resident of the Philippines and have spoken to elders regarding the variations of the Philippine Native Chicken and included some researches from local gov't articles have enriched my journey studying this beautiful, hardy fowl of my country..--Fowl vet 17:43, 18 August 2014‎ User:Fowl vet

Copyright problem removed edit

  • Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.backyardchickens.com/t/829034/hi-i-am-a-new-member-of-byc/10. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


In response to your query, the forum member "OZexpat" there referenced my article by copying from my article in Wikipedia to the backyardchickens.com forum website for discussion reasons in the year 2013. Therefore my article was copied again for reference and was not properly acknowledged. As I said before my Wikipedia article was written in the year 2011. Again, my article is not the problem, it is the persons utilizing, referencing my article who committed such infractions. Therefore, I as the original author, will rewrite this article to properly provide description to readers worldwide about this lovely fowl. --Fowl vet (talk)

The forum member "OZexpat" there referenced my article by copying from my article in Wikipedia to the backyardchickens.com forum website for discussion reasons in the year 2013. Therefore my article was copied again for reference and was not properly acknowledged. As i said before my Wikipedia article was written in the year 2011. Again, my article is not the problem, it is the persons utilizing, referencing my article who committed such infractions. Therefore, I as the original author, will rewrite this article to properly provide description to readers worldwide about this lovely fowl. --Fowl vet