This article is within the scope of WikiProject TUGS, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TUGSWikipedia:WikiProject TUGSTemplate:WikiProject TUGSTUGS articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Gratton, James (March–May 2011). "Crewmember Spotlight on Jeremy King". sodor-island.net. Retrieved March 17, 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link) - interview with Jeremy King, one of the designers for TUGS.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I really think something needs to be done about the constant claims that Britt Allcroft voiced (or 'possibly voiced') Sally Seaplane. I've taken them down more times than I can count, nearly always leaving messages telling the poster of their mistake, yet sooner or later someone comes along and reposts them again. I've seen the same thing on the Recurring Characters page with Lillie Lightship. All these people are doing is misleading readers and damaging the articles' integrity. There must be some course of action we can take. 150.237.199.249 (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply