Talk:List of mass spectrometry software

Latest comment: 21 days ago by 83.46.2.234 in topic Only MS/MS?

Proposed Re-organisation edit

Coming fresh to this page it seems to have a strange order. Proteo and meta omics are specialised and it would make far more sense to start with basic mass spectrometry before looking at software for GC-MS and basic LC-MS before moving onto the more complex subjects and then within the individual sections it should be done in alphabetical order Chppjs —Preceding undated comment added 22:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge edit

From SEQUEST and MzXML. --Kkmurray 18:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I removed the merge flag (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mass_spectrometry). The article should probably be reworked to fit into Category:Lists of software. --Kkmurray 18:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

MudpIT query edit

I am quoting a part from the article "... tandem mass spectrometry (also known as MS/MS or MS2) experiments (sometimes called shotgun proteomics or MuDPiT (Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology) experiments) are ..."- I highly doubt that MS?MS is called MudPIT. They are used in different contexts i believe. Please confirm and correct it if possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amityadavigib (talkcontribs) 19:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sub-Group Organization edit

  • Do others object to (me or anyone else) re-organizing the list of software into alphabetical order?

I think the separation into mass spec functions are useful, so keeping sequest and mascot in with database searching, denovoS and lutefisk in with de novo, and so forth is fine. My suggestion is to alplhabetize within each of these sub-groups.


  • Also, does anyone care to make suggestions for other categories we could include...rather than just a catch all "other" field? I'm not trying to make the page unncessarily long, just organized.

DavidTrin (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It should really be in paragraph form per WP:NOTDIRECTORY --Kkmurray (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
A lot of the other software lists (see talk above) are fairly list-like, though with some comment between them. As for categories Open Source/Proprietary can be a useful split - anyone object if I introduce this? --Y_Less|⅄‾˥ǝss 14:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move edit

I moved the page to the singular 'software' per MOS:RETAIN and consistency within Category:Lists_of_software. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on List of mass spectrometry software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of mass spectrometry software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Request to add software edit

Dear Wikipedia editors.

Please consider adding to the liss new software entry:

Section: Other software

Software name: mzAccess

Type of license: open source

Description: Open source web-service software for remote interactive access to the large collections of mass spectrometry data. mzAccess Web API provides ability to call for pieces (like chromatograms or spectra) of raw mass spectrometry data located at web-site

Reference: PMID: 28514166 [1]

Link:

website - http://mzaccess.org

github - https://github.com/Yaroslav-Lyutvinskiy

I can't do it by myself as I am author of that software and it is in contradiction with conflict interest rules. Nevertheless, I think this software adds a bit of unique functionality to mass spectrometry software toolset. By the nature it is open source web-service (web-site with API) providing interface to raw mass spectrometry data.

With respect, Yaroslav Lyutvinskiy (talk) 13:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Lyutvinskiy, Y; Watrous, JD; Jain, M; Nilsson, R (6 June 2017). "A Web Service Framework for Interactive Analysis of Metabolomics Data". Analytical chemistry. 89 (11): 5713–5718. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00890. PMID 28514166.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of mass spectrometry software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Only MS/MS? edit

The article seems to present MS/MS as the only method for protein identification. The article should include the Peptide Mass Fingerprinting strategy which is based on MS analysis. PMF was the first strategy we had for peptide identification and has been used for several decades until today. Protein Prospector and MASCOT have been reference tools for PMF database search from the mid-late 1990's and still used for this purpose. More recent software is dedicated to shotgun MS/MS identification and I am not sure they are capable of PMF identification. The table should include the specific capabilities in this respect. 83.46.2.234 (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply