Talk:List of lighthouses in Australia

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Inclusion criteria

edit

What are the inclusion criteria? Do you follow a list? I think this should be mentioned in the lead. --Muhandes (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I tagged {{linkrot}} for bare URLs. If you are going to use http://www.lighthouse.net.au extensively I can templatize it for you. --Muhandes (talk) 05:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Coming back to the inclusion criteria which was not addressed yet, Evans Head Light and Brush Island Light were recently added to the list. While they are with no doubt existing lights I doubt they should be included in a list of lighthouses. I believe a short, totally automated concrete hut, with a lamp on top is not worthy of mention. That's what List of Lights is for. I cannot think of good criteria out of the hat, but how about a practical criterion? To be listed a lighthouse has to be listed in at least one of the following sources: Lighthouses of Australia, SeaSide Lights or Directory of Lighthouses. --Muhandes (talk) 16:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK, that's fair enough. I can see your point, as you say "a short, totally automated concrete hut, with a lamp on top is not worthy of mention", and I would have to agree with you there, although it functions as a lighthouse, it itself is not a lighthouse. I think the criterion you describe is suitable. CybergothiChé (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Very well. I mentioned it somewhere in the text and removed these two. --Muhandes (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lightvessels

edit

Should lightvessels have their own section, either above or below the list of lighthouses? or should they be included in the list of states? CybergothiChé (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'd say put them in the states, and make a note that it is a lightvessel --Muhandes (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

"built" column

edit

Does the column "built" stand for the year in which the station was established? If so, it should say "Established" (this is in my opinion the best option). This also appears to be the case in some of the lines I checked. Another possibility is that it stands for the year the current building was built. Another is that it stands for the year in which the current light was lit, often years later. No matter what choice is made, this should be clarified. --Muhandes (talk) 06:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Woo it is going well!

Dates needed

Established

  • Northern Territory
Cape Fourcroy
  • Tasmania
Cape Forrestier
Highland Bluff (new)

Automated

  • Numerous.

Deactivated

  • Tasmania
Old Highland Bluff
  • New South Wales
Eastern Channel Pile Light
Western Channel Pile Light

CybergothiChé (talk) 12:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Iron Pot Lighthouse.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Iron Pot Lighthouse.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:03, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Beacon tower

edit

Maybe the beacon tower of The Hill, New South Wales could be mentioned? SignedJohnsonL623 (talk) 02:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of lighthouses and lightvessels in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply