Talk:List of largest insects

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 23.137.250.190 in topic Incorrect russian article linked

12" Mantid? edit

I think this needs at least a citation, it links to the African Mantis, but when you snake your way down the Wiki links the largest mantis you can find is reported to be 10cm (<4 inches). I also think the Heterochaeta sp. is bigger; certainly longer. Soundspawn (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wasps, tables, and sources edit

The article should have an entry for social wasps as well as for solitary wasps; the current organisation by order seems broadly sensible but somewhat artificially limits entries to one-per-order, whereas "largest ant", "largest bee" and "largest wasp" will seem different to many readers.

Perhaps a more flexible approach is needed, with name of insect and name of order in different (sortable) columns of a table.

Finally, the list is seriously under-referenced: there should be a source for every claim in the list. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Other large bugs edit

Is there a list of largest extinct insects or largest spiders that should appear under "see also"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niedzielski (talkcontribs) 00:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC) bugs are mamals not insects — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.74.4 (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of largest insects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Largest wasp? edit

According several media, a hornet longer than 6 cm has been found in China along the border of Myanmar. If not fake news, it dwarfs even the Asian giant hornet, Vespa mandarina.[1][2]

References edit

Pål Jensen (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Partially faked; you can see that someone has grabbed the sting and pulled the abdomen to almost double its normal length. Note in particular the image showing this specimen compared to other species of hornets - the abdomen NEVER exceeds the length of the hind legs unless the specimen has been stretched while drying. It is also clearly not a new species, it doesn't dwarf Vespa mandarinia, it IS Vespa mandarinia; it shows only minor differences from other specimens of the color form of mandarinia dubbed "magnifica", which has reduced abdominal bands, and is well-known from the area. The bottom of this page shows a similar specimen of magnifica with a wingspan over 80 mm, approaching the claim (93 mm) of the article you have linked. In other words, the only thing that could be legitimate about the news item you linked is the wingspan, and even that could easily be faked in a digital image. More to the point is that even at that size, it is not as large as Pepsis species, so STILL not the world's largest wasp, just the largest hornet. Dyanega (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I was also going to chime in that one of the sources was the Daily Mail, which is essentially banned on Wikipedia. Looks like that's well justified here. Kingofaces43 (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stoneflies, and then again, Stoneflies edit

Stoneflies are listed twice, both in the contents and the text. I can't discern what the scheme for listing sequence is for this compilation, so i don't know which one should be deleted. Someone who knows, please pick one and discard the other. 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:1D33:5C70:B51C:3D6E (talk) 11:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)JustSomeWikiReaderReply

Fixed. Thanks. Dyanega (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect russian article linked edit

Russian language version of this articse is https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B5 , which is Largest Arthropods, not Largest insects. 23.137.250.190 (talk) 09:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply