Talk:List of islands of Perth, Western Australia

List of islands of Perth, Western Australia was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 4, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Australia: Western Australia / Perth Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of islands of Perth, Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

FAIL edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The nomination is based on a mis-understanding of basic requirements for the article - it is full of redlinks JarrahTree 09:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nothing in the good article criteria, our guidelines on redlinks or guideline on stand-alone lists supports that claim. There is nothing wrong with redlinks. This article does fail the GA criteria straight off the bat, but that's because it's a "list" rather than an "article", and nothing to do with the presence of redlinks, which can often be perfectly appropriate. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough JarrahTree 08:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic