This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Corrimony is listed with Glen Urquhart, red-linked (no article), in the Neolithic sites list. The existing Glenurquhart article also mentions Corrimony. Which spelling is correct? Athænara ✉ 07:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
It has always been my understanding (being a Scot growing up just a little north of the area) that "Glen Urquhart" is the actual Glen whilst "Glenurquhart" the area of the Glen? This would mean that the current Glenurquhart article should be Glen Urquhart
This seems to agree with me, you can see Glen Urquhart winding its way up the A831 and note the Glenurquhart forest. Need someone to get some sort of harder evidence I guess. Znx 20:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
