Talk:List of highest mountains of Tasmania

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

doh?

edit

The first sentence talks of 15 mountains but the list has 10? SatuSuro 11:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

doh further

edit

Links to numbers of mountain names show disambig needs to be worked on due to generally widely used mountain names - SatuSuro 14:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done :-) --Ozhiker (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Du Cane Range

edit

As far as I can see from the LISTmap service, and from this link, the highest point of the Du Cane Range is Mount Massif, yet the article for Mount Massif claims it is only the second highest. The coordinates for Du Cane Range point to the middle of Pine Valley, which is not very helpful. Can someone point me to where the highest point is? --Ozhiker (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Federation Peak

edit

I just made the prominence column sortable. The prominence given for Federation Peak (105m) is clearly incorrect. I make it to be around 800 metres, but this is derived from a contour analysis, not an authoritative source. 60.242.106.235 (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of highest mountains of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply