Talk:List of hereditary and lineage organizations in the United States

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Genealogy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Umm, U.S. bias much? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

i am sure that instead of all those red links, we could add some organisations from other nations to make this have a greater worldwide view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphamone (talk • contribs) 11:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

So why don't you add some from other countries?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.76.136.54 (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

HEREDITARY and LINEAGE organizations edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page is full of ethnic organizations that are not hereditary or lineage organizations. The latter require proof of descent from a cohort of people, e.g., those who fought in a particular war or who arrived on the same boat, not just membership in a particular ethnic group. This list needs to be purged of organizations that don't belong. Prkimmel (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[no signature provided]Reply

NEW QUESTIONS: 1. Why are certain other lineage organizations not listed? I note two as examples: The Order of Alba (descent from a monarch of Scotland, per their website <ref>www.orderofalba.org<ref>) and The Society of Indiana Pioneers (descent from someone who settled in Indiana on or before December 31, 1840, per their website <ref>www.indianapioneers.org<ref>). If nothing else, we could add a page just showing what they say on their websites and then list them on the "List of Hereditary and Lineage Organizations" page. 2. I note some listings starting with National Society and others that have that in their official names not showing as such in this "List of Hereditary and Lineage Organizations". I note two as examples: The National Society Daughters of the American Revolution <ref>www.dar.org<ref> and the National Society, Sons of the American Revolution <ref>www.sar.org<ref>, each being listed without their "National Society" prefix. See Since each is better known without the prefix, why not list all "National Society" organizations with that moniker appended rather than prefixing their names? Tim! (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Paul KimmelReply

Requested move 2 June 2019 edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Some editors consider the proposed name to be more ambiguous than the current name. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 07:25, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of hereditary and lineage organizations → Hereditary society – Internet seems to confirm this at least as an option. Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Learned society and Honor society. While transforming it more into an article on the topic, it could still retain a bit of a list? PPEMES (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 12:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oppose too confusing, though the present name is certainly poor. List of American societies based on heredity possibly? It's just a list, and we should keep that. Equally, all, with one Russian exception that doesn't seem to belong at all, are American it seems. I removed the Honourable Artillery Company which absolutely doesn't belong. Note that Hereditary society currently redirects to Family history society - what do you propose to about that? Many others seem not to belong here at all: Swedish Colonial Society, Veteran Corps of Artillery of the State of New York. Johnbod (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Leaning oppose, given the apparent ambiguity of the proposed target name. bd2412 T 03:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic