Talk:List of foodborne illness outbreaks by death toll

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:88E2:7485:9A0D:280E in topic Two outbreaks worth adding

"Deadliest" incidents edit

The list includes those where only 1 death occurred and few or no others infected. Not to make light of any death, should we have a criteria for what is included (5+ deaths), or allow all incidents? There must be thousands of incidents a year, perhaps dozens in which someone dies (particularly the elderly). Maybe this article is really about "Notable" incidents and could be renamed? Green Cardamom (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Someone randomly dying isn't an outbreak, however. I think incidents in the title should be renamed to outbreaks, as that is the title used by the CDC and in other countries. Someone can die in an isolated case, but people dying from a wider outbreak is different. SilverserenC 14:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok fine with me, but how do we define "outbreak" for the purpose of list criteria inclusion? I think "deadliest" is problematic since it's a subjective word with no clear criteria. "Notable" however we can apply Wikipedia rules (ie. wide press coverage) and not get into the death counting game which is morbid and anyway not always relevant. How about Notable foodborne illness outbreaks. Finally, why do we say "foodborne illness" and not the more commonly used term "food poisoning", such as Notable food poisoning outbreaks? Green Cardamom (talk) 16:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Deadliest is actually a far more clear term than incidents is. Deadliest is determined by the number of deaths, how "deadly" it was. That's an easily quantifiable number. I'm not quite sure hot to define outbreak, however. I mean, if it already has a Wikipedia article, then that's clear enough, but i'm not sure about an "outbreak" that doesn't have an article. Presumably, though, the two red links currently in the list, especially the first one, could have articles made on them, it just hasn't been done yet. So I don't think this is a big issue. SilverserenC 00:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
User:Good Olfactory objected to "outbreaks". Essentially this is just a table of all ready existing articles sorted by number of dead. The press makes them notable, usually by the number of infected or the rarity of the disease, such as the case with botulism from canned food. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Then it's a "List of" article? "Deadliest" really is problematic in this case. If we're going to quantify "deadliest", then we need to start deleting stuff from the article, and we probably don't want to do that. The article contains notable entries that are not all that deadly (unless 1 death = deadliest). Anyway whose to say what "deadliest" means. Green Cardamom (talk) 06:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your confusing deadliest all-over outbreak, with deadliest by each disease. One death from botulism is still the deadliest botulism case. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Related article edit

List of food contamination incidents has some referenced incidents with deaths resulting that are not mentioned here, and that article lacks some information contained in this one. Copying relevant content between the two could improve both articles.Dialectric (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of foodborne illness outbreaks by death toll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possibly add the Calgary Daycare E. Coli Outbreak? edit

Ongoing, but might need to be added, pretty bad 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:D15E:848B:8ED1:505D (talk) 23:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see This Sep 27, 2023 update which does not mention deaths. Do you have a reliable source that covers deaths linked to the outbreak? Dialectric (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
It ended up with no deaths in the end, despite the number of infections being in the hundreds and several cases of kidney failure. Quite remarkable 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:9530:7901:2022:B96D (talk) 05:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can someone add the VCJD/HSBE outbreak in British Beef to the list? edit

178 Deaths 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:34F5:529C:B1C2:2398 (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

In the chemical section, could someone add the 1944 Oregon Hospital outbreak of bloody vomiting caused by cockroach poison in eggs? edit

^ 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:A902:269:581:AB2F (talk) 20:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have added the incident. Thanks for the suggestion. Dialectric (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Two outbreaks worth adding edit

The 1919-1920 Botulism Outbreak in black olives that killed 18 people in the states. It was the first outbreak to prompt reform in food quality control and changing in procedure, and the first to be well investigated.

There's also that outbreak in Japan in the 90s that killed quite a few people. 2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:88E2:7485:9A0D:280E (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply