Talk:List of flags of convenience

Nomination for deletion of Template:CIA trans ref

Template:CIA trans ref has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 07:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorting

The numbers are ASCII-sorted, not numerically (i.e., 95 is being counted as higher than 639, etc). Can someone fix this? --Kloth (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Diplomatic Relations

What is the relevance, if any, of the comments that China does not have diplomatic relations with some of these states? Davidships (talk) 10:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

It might be more clear to go back to my previous iteration that said those countries do not recognize China, and/or link to the Foreign relations of the Republic of China page to explain why. My attempt was to point out that there are ships that fly the flag of a country which does not vaildate the ship's country of origin. (I should add that São Tomé and Príncipe also does not recognize China, but there are no substantially-sized Chinese ships registered with them, so I did not include the note in that case.)

When all is said and done, it probably doesn't have any less relevance than the fact that Mongolia & Bolivia are landlocked.Farolif (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm still struggling to comprehend the connection with the ITF's "Flags of Convenience", and don't understand what is meant by "there are ships that fly the flag of a country which does not validate the ship's country of origin." It doesn't need diplomatic relations to confirm the beneficial owner of a ship - nor, so far as I know, are diplomatic processes normally used for this purpose. To turn the issue round, the well-known Republic of China shipping group Evergreen currently has ships under the flags of 3 countries with which RoC has no diplomatic relations - as well as one registered in Hong Kong! (And the fact that only two of the world's landlocked countries that have merchant ship registers are on the ITF's FoC list is of little consequence either - there are plenty that aren't).

As the article is about an ITF list, I think that it should just stick to that.Davidships (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of flags of convenience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518030233/http://www.itfglobal.org/flags-convenience/sub-page.cfm to http://www.itfglobal.org/flags-convenience/sub-page.cfm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513185850/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bh.html to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bh.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612213634/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/fr.html to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/fr.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5tygEnlqv?url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of flags of convenience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509160033/http://www.bahamasmaritime.com/Documents/fssa%20form.pdf to http://www.bahamasmaritime.com/Documents/fssa%20form.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720231800/http://www.rif.mer.equipement.gouv.fr/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=36 to http://www.rif.mer.equipement.gouv.fr/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=36
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131123014620/http://publicinfrastructure.gov.mu/English/Shipping%20Division/Pages/default.aspx to http://publicinfrastructure.gov.mu/English/Shipping%20Division/Pages/default.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131231000305/http://www.mot.gov.mm/dma/index.html to http://www.mot.gov.mm/dma/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)