Talk:List of fictional University of Oxford people
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:List of fictional University of Oxford people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
What happened to the "Fictional Balliol Characters" page? --there was one on Wikipedia a month or two ago and it seems to have been replaced by this page
Literature and discussion on fictional Balliol characters has a long and ancient history --the Wikipedia page that was up could have been the start of something terrific --who took it down and why? It seems to me that it should have been left up so that it could have grown and been added to over time. I had been myself planning to add Uncle Monty from 'Withnail and I' but there is no point in adding it to some generic Oxford list of fictional characters --far too dilutive a topic to hold anyone's interest. To whoever took that page down --please put it back up! Many thanks 66.108.107.88 (talk) 00:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)jon m |
Last edited at 00:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 22:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Revert
editCan the editor who made this revert[1] point to where in our guidelines he has support for that statement in his edit summary? I believe he is incorrect. --2603:7000:2143:8500:284F:1640:953:7AA8 (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's an obvious case of WP:BLUE. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 11:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- First of all, that is an essay - one person's view - not a guideline. Secondly, our guidelines require a citation. That what is said in this list is the case is not obvious in the least. --2603:7000:2143:8500:BCE6:9F4B:E3D8:9A43 (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- I am well aware of the difference. I am simply pointing out why your edit is not finding wider favour. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- You have failed to provide a proper explanation for violating our rules. 2603:7000:2143:8500:BCE6:9F4B:E3D8:9A43 (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)