Talk:List of equipment of the South African Army

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of equipment of the South African Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613003404/http://www.rfdiv.mil.za/pdfs/publications/gunner/gunner.pdf to http://www.rfdiv.mil.za/pdfs/publications/gunner/gunner.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• A Seeker 400 drone, manufactured by South African company Denel Dynamics, flies over Cape Town Stadium..jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced content

I suspect much of this article is now incorrect, as there have been numerous edits that have added unsourced content. I've reverted a recent batch, but the entire article should be seen as suspect and each figure re-verified. Greenman (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@Greenman I've just done a few minor corrections, will have a go at larger issues in the coming days and weeks. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)