Talk:List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Blitzkriegfree in topic Carl Gustaf M4

Hello edit

This is much better, having the equipment info on a sub page. Recon.Army (talk) 10:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bergepanzer 3 edit

If I'm correct polish army don't operate any of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.255.154.76 (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are not correct, they do have them. --74.65.227.150 (talk) 22:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

WPB Anders edit

WPB Anders     Poland Multirole Combat Platform Light tank
Infantry fighting vehicle
? 1,000 on order[1]

I removed this sourced information - notice it's not actually an order, but plan to purchase up to 1000 tracked vehicles of various type. --SojerPL (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page moves edit

@Tbx3571: you have moved this page five times in the past three days, despite it being moved back by three different editors. This is a type of edit warring that is not permitted, (and which you are already aware due to the numerous warnings on your talk page). You need to stop this disruptive behavior and start discussing. - wolf 19:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Thewolfchild: I make it five times in the past two hours. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@GraemeLeggett: yep, on it. Feel free to join in at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tbx3571 reported by wolf (Result: ). Cheers - wolf 20:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • @Tbx3571: If you feel that the Polish Land Forces' equipment list should not follow the standard used for other militaries, please feel free to justify the move here. If you can establish WP:Consensus, then the move can be made. —C.Fred (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Someone removed pretty much all firearms and artillery pieces in Warsaw Pact standard even though they are still in service. edit

This is a surprise for me but whoever did this I have to ask you a question. Why? What for? Yes those are two questions. But I see no purpose in removing them. It is obvious that Poland being former WP member does have plenty of WP standard weapons even if they are in limited service they are still being used! In a matter of fact even several Polish weapons were removed just because they were designed in soviet times. Ridiculous! Few examples: Assault rifles AKM and several other variants - still used for training and several units in "the boonies" standard reserve weapon. wz.1960 - ne reports about it being retired. Pistols: P-83 pistol - not yet retired. Machine Guns: Dshk- used on Dana SPG. NSV - used on T-72 and ARVs. PKM - used together with UKM-2000. M134 - not a WP weapon but still missing from this list - used on MI-17 helicopters Grenade-based weapons: pallad grenade launchers - used with beryl rifles. F1, RG-42, RG-42 - soviet grenades in Polish service. RGo-88, UGD-200, CGR-42a - Polish designed grenades including training ones. Polish designed rifle grenades : GNPO, NGZ-93, NGD-93 and NGOS. Portable anti-material weapons: RPG-7 - Basic RPG in Polish service. Carl Gustaff - used by Polish airborne.

And so on and on. List is lacking soviet mortars and field arty (in storage others used for ceremonial purposes but that means it still is being used!) Soviet trucks like kraz-255 and utility vechicles like uaz-469 (command versions)

As you can see number of removed weapons and vechicles is huge! Whoever is responsible please correct your mistake and repair this list, otherwise it is pointless. 31.183.154.229 (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@31.183.154.229 considered it done WykoxPL (talk) 17:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@WykoxPL: I've decided to bring back old version of section "Infantry weapons" because editor: Aramazd, OAramazdO (probably one person with "unique" other nicknames) decided to remove without any sources any weapon which could be considered as old. Worse things happend in section "Vehicles" - for god sake, no one ever ordered AMZ Bóbr-3, there are under tests, but still, there are 0 of these vehicles in service, in fact, BRDM-2 are still in use, want some photos from this year? We should watch over him, because this page has a long list of wrong informations here. - WykoxPL 11:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC+1)

K9A2 or K9A1 edit

"the K9PL system is to make use of the K9A2 technologies - including the autoloader system that made it possible to reduce the crew needed to operate the howitzer to 3 soldiers."

https://defence24.com/armed-forces/polish-k9pl-howitzers-unveiled-photos

It's based on the K9A1 variant of course, as those will be modernized, but to the K9A2 standard, so technically they're K9A2. Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (talk) 11:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If no one objects, I'll change it tomorrow. Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Uwdwadafsainainawinfi No, they're not. https://twitter.com/krzysztof_atek/status/1597577719411511296?t=x9gpzHwvucxuMG_IBT84qQ&s=19
This is tweet from Polish Armaments Agency Spokesman, which says that K9PL will be based on K9A1 standard, with probably minor changes adopted from AHS Krab and K9A2. WykoxPL (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the clarification Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (talk) 18:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mossberg 500's edit

Why is the shown number of guns so low? The source doesn't relate to the guns and the page about the mossberg's say that there's over 50 thousand in use by the MP's but that also seems way to high does anyone know more definatively? Hussaria1 (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

MATV edit

Before the purchase of 79 MATV last year, there were already 45 MATV in the armed forces. totaling now to be 124 MATV’s. Ilikeclouds (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Carl Gustaf M4 edit

Currently the page says that Poland has > 6,000 launchers. Of course this is not true, as deliveries are only just starting (if they even did). So what should we put as the actual quanity?

My ideas:

0/6000

?/6000 Blitzkriegfree (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply